...or finishes the story.

10/19/12 11:56pm

Previous Image Next Image

g1 DISCUSSIONS

mas8705

October 22, 2012 - 1:09am

Asura's Wrath was the only game I can think of in which I was actually happy getting the DLC to see the final ending.

Only if a game is worth it would you actually go and buy the DLC to see how it ends, otherwise you are pretty much just going to leave it as that.

Blue Madness

October 21, 2012 - 12:52pm

This isn't a good thing, and the image is misleading. Borderlands does finish it's own story, and all DLCs are expansions.

SanjiSasuke

December 29, 2012 - 5:52pm

Yeah, I'd say Saints Row 2 is a better example. It actually does finish off the story with SR1, and the rest of Ultor (+ interlude to Red Faction.)

Linklex7

October 21, 2012 - 2:16am

Adding to an ending is one thing, but if the ending is actually broken off the game to sell as DLC that pisses me off.

Ataeru

October 20, 2012 - 4:09pm

ok, im not sure how it was for the original borderlands. but are you honestly saying it's ok for the ending to not be finished, or cut out?

Blue Madness

October 21, 2012 - 12:53pm

Like I said in my other comment, Borderlands does finish it's own story, the DLCs are expansions. This image is misleading.

halloll

October 20, 2012 - 8:44am

you know, the story the so called full game was supposed to finish.

Well I'd certainly rather have DLC finish the story (especially if it lets you continue playing as seen in Fallout 3's Broken Steel DLC, which let you keep playing after what used to be the end of the game) Rather than have the game end after the final quest (like in Fallout: New Vegas when you complete the battle for Hoover Dam.)