Hey. Follow us and stuff.

Look how social we are.

 

BlueBlur91 Rants: Sexism in Video Games

2/11/13 2:00pm
tl;dr

Are video games, in general, offensive towards the fairer sex? Are they unfair to girls? Or is sexism a two way street, where you can pinpoint a tiny detail about ANY game and brand it "sexist"?

*DISCLAIMER* 

 I do not, in any sense, condone any sort of blatant, offensive sexism, in any form.

I also acknowledge the fact that there ARE games out there that portray women as nothing more than a mere object of desire and appeal, as you will find out if you read on.

Please enjoy the read.

 

[The Source]

If you're a gamer, and let's face it, you probably are if you're browsing this site, then you know exactly what games are all about. While all of them have different setting, objectives and content, I think it's fair to say that games are all about displaying and expressing creativity. Experiencing a story, whether it's one you determine yourself, or one where you play a role of a character. Then there are games that don't have a story at all. These games tend to focus more on giving you an experience through gameplay and visuals. Many games do all of the above.

But do games mold and shape you as a person? Do they change your view of things, such as the value of life and the sentence for committing crime?

As with media, they would have you believe that video games not only turn children violent but undermine, offend and bully women. Video Games are an easy target for this controversy because the market happens to be dominated by males, and thus, creators tend to mold female characters to fit the male playing the game. Whether that is putting her in skimpy clothing or giving her a perfect figure, or face, seems to be offensive on all accounts. But do women really have the right to cry fowl and label the entire industry as sexist?

Sexism towards women in games

I actually don't think video games are unfair to women. I think women are unfair to video games. And I think this for various reasons, mainly because of the points feminist raise. There are loads of vulgar games out there, but feminist only attack petty things about games that, in reality, have no sexism in it. Things like Lara Croft's bust, for example.

Don't know Lara Croft? Let me give you a quick rundown.

Lara Croft is a hyper-athletic, super-intelligent archeologist, who through all of her adventures treks into extremely dangerous places, riddled with traps, wild predators, and hired goons out to put a bullet in her head.

Armed with two thigh-strapped pistols, Lara deals with the latter two problems. The rest are completely up to her physical abilities to climb ledges, solve puzzles and performing step-by-step acrobatic maneuvers flawlessly in order to save herself from falling to her death.

Yet with that portfolio, media labels this character as sexist. Degrading to women. Why? Because during Lara's original development, a graphic designer "accidentally" miscalculated the values of the polygons forming her bust, giving her a bigger chest than the character's owner and creator had planned. The creators of the game decided to keep this alteration, ignoring the owner's plea to please keep her original palette. The creator of Lara Croft has since then left Eidos, disgraced by the way the company treated his creation.

Very recently Lara has stirred a bit more controversy regarding an attempted grope/rape scene that supposedly happens in her newest game. The game developers have defended this by stating that "It gives the player a sense of distress towards Lara, and makes them feel more protective of her, and want to keep her out of danger."

Is it fair of Lara's supposed owners to treat a character like this? Absolutely not. Is it fair that they advertised one of her earliest games with her in the shower and having Playboy write an article about her? Absolutely not. Because Lara Croft is a cool enough character to be able to succeed on her own merit. She doesn't need sex to be sold to males as a sex symbol. We'd love the character even if she didn't have zeppelins strapped to her.

This is the wrong game to attack when it comes to sexism. There are games that are actually crude, actually MADE for the simple reason of giving men something to look at. Tomb Raider is the exact opposite of unfairness towards women.

It's like when people attack Metroid because of Zero Suit Samus.

On the left; The Samus everyone knows. The Samus we all loved and played as years and years ago.  Most, if not all of us, always thought Samus was a man. Why? Because Samus never took off her suit throughout the series UNLESS you finished the game under extreme conditions, like finishing the game in under an hour. If you finished the very first game in three to five hours, you were treated to Samus taking off her helmet and revealing her long hair.

But some people never knew Samus was a woman until Smash Brothers: Brawl, funnily enough. This is mainly because of the young age of gamers, who never got the chance to play the Metroid games on the old Nintendo consoles.

Many people claim Samus' zero suit to be borderline nudity. Her second-skin outfit hugs her skin very tightly, revealing a lot of her physical attributes. So what, would you rather have her wear nothing? Or underwear perhaps, like she did in the first ever Metroid? What do YOU suggest a woman should wear under her hyper-evolutionary bounty-hunter space suit?

What's my opinion on this? Well, if you judge a character by what they wear under their main clothes/armor, wouldn't all games just be porn?


 

I bet you are wearing linen underwear under those clothes and armor. WHORES!

Another point feminists bring up while discussing games is that they give men an unrealistic and unfair view of what women SHOULD look like. Here's the deal, we know video games are fake. This is also why no one, ever, goes outside and copies what they did on Grand Theft Auto. People are able to play a game with "hot looking" women in it and come out of it exactly the same. No one ever gets a girlfriend and thinks to himself "I wish my girlfriend had skin consisting of millions of tiny blocks and triangle-boobs".

Furthermore, so what? WOMEN give men an unrealistic view of what they look like! Make-up, millions of types of bras that make your chest look different, hair extensions, corsets, the list goes on!

And if video games treat women unfairly and give people the wrong view of women, you know who is worse off?

MEN!

If there is anything more exaggerated than women, it is men. That´s right. Video games are not "attacking" women or "labeling them as objects of desire and nothing more". Just because you look at a character and she has a good figure and a pretty face, does not mean the game is automatically sexist.

Just because the game includes a princess in distress does, in fact, not make it offensive to women.

"Peach is an extremely sexist character! She is always in trouble and always cries for help! She portrays women as nothing but a pretty face to be chased after!"

Oh. Okay. So in that case ...;

"Mario is an extremely sexist character. He is short and fat, and yet is highly athletic. He spends all his time helping his girlfriend, and let's be fair, they wouldn't have it any other way. He portrays men as fat, unattractive weightlifters who just happen to be a total doormat when it comes to his significant other's needs."

Don't take something and try and twist it into something it's not. Yes, Peach and Zelda are often damsels in distress. There are A LOT of cases of males being in distress, and often, gutless whimps. Luigi, in his OWN GAME, spends THE ENTIRETY OF IT crying out for his brother and looking for him because he is PETRIFIED! Otacon in the Metal Gear Solid series is caught PISSING HIMSELF IN FEAR! VISUALLY AND LITERALLY CREATING A PUDDLE OF URINE BY HIS FEET!

Where am I going with all this? Well, it's not fair to label the video game industry as sexist. It's just not. It is also not fair to take a tiny content of a game and try and spin it into something that MIGHT POSSIBLY MAYBE IN THE RIGHT PERSPECTIVE BE SOMETHING MILDLY SEXIST.

Yes, there are games that ACTUALLY ARE SEXIST and actually ARE VULGAR!. But judge THEM on their OWN MERIT! Don't start looking at all games through feminist glasses just because some game somewhere just happened to be a walking bust with a bum. Most men dislike the things that you find unfair to women just as much as you do.

Many men don't like the fact that female characters seem to get bikini armour when their male counterpart doesn't. Many men don't like it when their games seem to be ruined by a squealing, helpless, crying girl that also just so happens to have the hots for the protagonist. Just because a woman has a pretty face and a good figure, and just because a man is super handsome and buff, does NOT make the game sexist! Don't be so close minded! 

Thanks for reading, I appreciate any feedback. And please, don't take any offense to anything I've written. Nothing I've said is an attack on anyone. For all I know, you are awesome! :)

More wicked cool stories and video from around the web. Got tips for us? Tips@ScrewAttack.com

g1 DISCUSSIONS

drunkenelfmage

February 14, 2013 - 6:33pm

Oh cool, I didn't expect a reply. Nice to see that you are going about this discussion in a level headed way.

I guess the skin tight suit would make sense in a stealth sort of way, but it isn't a stealth suit. I just read the entire wiki page on the Zero Suit at the Metroid. The Zero suit is described as her default outfit outside of her power suit, one that allows for maximum movement and acrobatics, which I suppose makes sense and actually fulfills your argument in the first place (although that still doesn't explain the existence of Boob socks http://shattered-earth.tumblr.com/post/36368384588/bless-these-breasts ). But in response I must ask you this...

Why the hell did they need to show off her body in the first place?

Samus up until the reveal of the Zero suit has always been androgynous, or at least anti feminine (bikini reveal at the end of the original Metroid excluded). Her suit never was "girly" , she was a walking tank with a canon on her arm, a badass that could take on entire alien race. THAT was her appeal. The only reason I can think of a reason for her skin tight suit is to show off "teh sexxy".

Also now that I think about it, it is kind of disturbing that the smash ball strips her of her armor. That means part of the prize of getting the smash ball on top of a giant attack was a chance to get her semi naked. I doubt that was part of the developers intention, but it is a little disturbing to find that in a game meant for all ages.

And as for why not every one would want to play as Lara Croft, some women are uncomfortable with the idea about being in a high danger assignment with short shorts. Imagine Nathan Drake going through an entire level in a skin tight revealing outfit, for no other reason besides that is what he always wears. Imagine running around an entire game looking like a stripper. It would give you an entirely different feeling than if you went about that level in his average outfit.

I made a few assumptions about you about how you approached games and I apologize for that. ALthough I do think I once heard that the person you play as in Slender is a little girl, so just food for thought.

Everything is offensive from some standpoint. I can imagine you have encountered some dumb forum posters just screaming in all caps about how Peach is the most offensive thing of all time, but she really is just a creation from the past. Shes fun and cute and proven to be very capable, but being a damsel in distress has always been the very premise of her character.

Think of what kinds of characters you can think of as Manly. All different kind of body types come to mind, like Wolverine (short, bulky, hairy), Nathan Drake (Medium Build,), the incredable Hulk (Muscular, sometimes a little chubby), Spiderman (well not exactly manly, but still a desirable body type for some), and hell even Mario (Blue Collar worker with the manliest of Mustaches). Now think of the body types for women considered feminine (without clothes). Besides a few outliers, almost every women in AMERICAN media that I can think of is always skinny with an average height, fit but not muscular, with not always HUGE breasts, but they sure as hell aren't small, with a figure eight body. There are variations, sure, but not to the degree that masculinity allows.

I could talk about this all day, but I probably should end this soon. You're right games aren't real, they are a form of media. And a good portion of media like books and movies, are probably more sexist than some video games. But as a gamer, we both should hold games to a higher standard. I'm not saying that sexist games don't have a right to exist, or that Princess Peach needs to wear jeans and a jacket. I am just saying there are ways we can IMPROVE upon games in the future.

PS Please change the part about where WOMEN portray themselves deceptively. Thats a statement about half the human race that simply isn't true, and is the only part of the post that I consider offensive. Women don't set out to deceive men, dude. Its call freaking fashion and not all women follow it. . Following that line of thinking, men are deliberately deceiving women about their smell by putting on deodorant.

BlueBlur91

February 15, 2013 - 6:38am

Like I've said, you're totally right about Samus' outfit. They did not, at all, have to have her strip her power armour off at all. But that's just not the way things went I guess. I'd have preferred them to go about it more respectively than that.

Peach is a damsel in distress! She totally is, in every canon Mario game, she is kidnapped. But once again, it doesn't make her a sexist offence to women, it's just a part of the game's shallow narrative of "damsel in distress". It's existed since the creation of creative writing.

As for your PS, I'm afraid once it's been adopted by ScrewAttack, I am unable to edit the blog post in any way. But I think you are taking it a bit too personally/seriously, or simply being a bit sensitive about that one point.

I am well aware women don't set out to deceive men, and I know not ALL WOMEN EVER do some ONE thing, I know full well that everyone is different, but as I am speaking of the extremely wide term "women" and paint it with that extremely broad brush, it cannot be avoided that women like to "alter" their appearance to not only look, but feel better about themselves.

I am not at all slating that fact., nor am I saying it's wrong or some sort of conspiracy. What I'm trying to put across is simply that when it comes to women slating the character's creator for making women unrealistically attractive, they have no argument, because when it comes to fashion, supermodels and not to mention make-up products and clothes (which ALOT, not ALL, but in general WOMEN, I refer you to the "general term" thing I mentioned.) follow and wear, it's all about artificial body shapes and altered appearance.

We could sit here and go back and fourth about what we do and don't like all day, and I've completely agreed with most of what you said. Chances are we share the same views, but I'm just the one who's written quite a short blog standing up for video games in general, because I find it highly unfair to label the entire industry as sexist, and you feel I could have made better/stronger/different points, which is fair enough. :)

drunkenelfmage

February 15, 2013 - 12:16pm

This has been fun, I swear this reply will be a short one.

Men alter their appearance too, just saying. Just by looking myself wearing a thick sweater, I am trying to disguise my fat body as simply being thick. That kind of thing doesn't belong to one gender. And just because some women put on a little make up and wear a bra to make their boobs look a little better doesn't mean that they lose the right to point out when a creation is offensive in their design. I love the game Skull Girls, LOVE IT, (Peacock is my main), but can you a blame a girl (my friend, not me) for being a little uncomfortable when one of the characters main attacks clearly shows off the girls panties (seriously, they could have simply switched the leg she used to avoid this)? Why the hell wouldn't she use shorts if she was going to be in a high combat situation?

The games industry isn't completely sexist, but it is far from perfect. Just check the ratio of male to female protagonists. We probably do share a lot of views, though. And we should be glad that out spoken feminists are finally a look at video games and criticizing them. That means they are looking at them with the same maturity and respect as the movies and books they have been criticizing for far longer.

BlueBlur91

February 15, 2013 - 12:32pm

I can't blame your friend, at all. My girlfriend feels the same way about most games I play.

SkullGirls IS sexist, DoA IS sexist. exploiting "wardrobe malfunctions" etc. to give men a sexual thrill, and I totally get that girls and women dislike stuff like that. In fact, I'm completely aware they do. This blog is more about me feeling that it's extremely unfair to label an entire media, which I happen to like, as something it's not.

And you're right, anyone can alter their appearance, if only to feel a bit better about themselves, a little confidence boost. But put what I said in context. When someone who does alter their appearance states something like "This product gives this man a fake view of what women actually look like", it IS a case of the kettle calling the pot black. At the end of the day, people like feeling good about themselves. So when people that are self concious (and let's be fair, many many people are) start finding a tiny little detail that makes them feel bad about something, and essentially make a mountain out of a molehill (like the case is with Peach), that's not the game offending you. That's you being offended by something that isn't there. While things like SkullGirls exist, you should critique them, because at the end of the day, that's blatantly obvious and the game and creators are highly aware of it.

LegendStormcrow

February 12, 2013 - 2:46am

I kinda have to agree with you, though women do give unrealistic visions of themselves, some of the time and make the ones who don't feel like crap. I mean i am pissed that my wife worked at the prison just so other women wouldn't view her as a leach.

HS199432

February 12, 2013 - 12:14am

Great article, but I really gotta give you props for being the only person to acknowledge DAII existed.

Lord Moe

February 12, 2013 - 12:08am

this is a very naive blog post. I loved the part where you tried to claim that they are sexist toward men.

Look up the "false equivalence fallacy." you might learn something.

BlueBlur91

February 14, 2013 - 3:58pm

I feel your comment is a bit more naive than this post. In retrospect, if the way games portray women is sexist, then they are to men as well. You'd see that, and my points, if you had read this thoroughly enough, granted you need to be a bit more open-minded than that.

Lord Moe

February 14, 2013 - 4:21pm

the problem comes when you try to make claims that the games are sexist towards men. That, in and of itself, is a fallacy. The big rugged men you see in games aren't sexualized to appeal to women; they are male power fantasies. When games started out they were heavily male dominated. You often played some kind of rugged, manly warrior saving a beautiful damsel in distress. Games were made so that we could step into the shoes of a hero and perform heroic deeds. It was wish fulfillment, and since most gamers were men it was only natural that developers would have you play as rugged, strong, athletic men. It is something men would like to be. Women in the games were meant to appeal to those male gamers.

The problem comes when we have reached this age and these tropes still haven't changed. The demographic has changed, but the mentality hasn't. We still have scantily clad women even with the increase of female gamers. The mentality for male characters hasn't changed either: these characters still serve as male power fantasies. Here is where the false equivalence fallacy comes into play. Whereas the scantily clad women are meant as titillation for male gamers, the rugged male characters are not meant as titillation for female gamers.

BlueBlur91

February 15, 2013 - 8:37am

Give the article another read-over mate. Seems the point completely flew over your head. I never said the males are made to cater towards women, the point was that BOTH sexes are unrealistically portrayed and proportioned in video games, simply because of the fact that they are fictional.

The point is that games, in general, on a wider scale than DoA, Bayonetta and Lollipop Chainsaw, aren't unfair to women specifically. Truth is both sexes are portrayed wrongly and unfairly.

ScrewAttack Classics

Sonic CD & Shaving He...

Made popular in 2011

Eddie Lebron's...

Made popular in 2009

CAM_2 FILE# P406135

Made popular in 2010

Chad And His Dad Save The...

Made popular in 2012

Clip of the Week - Honest...

Made popular in 2009