Is Nintendo Following the Path of Sega?
Upon the announcement of the Wii U, there have been some stumbles made by Nintendo that have left folks scratching their heads. You know your new console announcement is off to a rough start when a fair amount of gamers (including yours truly) originally thought it was a new controller for the Wii.
Now that the next console cycle has been kicked off, there have been some striking comparisons I've noted between Nintendo today and Sega upon release of the Dreamcast. Is "The Big N" destined to leave the console race and become a third party developer like its former rival?

We start off our investigation by looking at how Nintendo and Sega went into their respective console generations. The Saturn console was considered a failure in which Sega responded with a strong marketing campaign for their final foray into hardware. Alternatively, the Wii was considered a major success thanks to the general public accepting motion controls and casual titles. This had lead into a questionably lackluster marketing campaign for the Wii U.
This lack of action by Nintendo was discussed by David Cole, founder and president of interactive entertainment market research firm DFC Intelligence.
Both the Wii U and Dreamcast kicked off their console cycles trying something different and ahead of their time. Sega introduced their system with a built-in modem that ended up being the stepping stone for current services like Xbox Live and PlayStation Network. The successor to the Wii pushes motion controls forward utilizing a touch screen controller which allows drawing sketches in messages and playing games without the need of a television. It's worth noting also that the Dreamcast first introduced the concept of a screen being utilized in the controller (via memory card).

Peas in a pod
One comparison in particular, however, has me really spooked. Both consoles started off with strong sales upon launch yet experienced sharp declines shortly afterwards. In the case of the Wii U, this has been reflected through many consoles still remaining on store shelves by the end of December. Nintendo has recently boasted selling $30 million more within 6 weeks of launch than the Wii which certainly isn't untrue. You have to consider placing an asterisk on that claim though since Wii supplies didn't meet demand and were sold at a lower price point than its successor.
While the Dreamcast experienced the beginning of the end upon announcement of the PlayStation 2, signs point towards a very similar scenario happening for the Wii U. My own personal experience with fellow gamers in forums, article comments, and social media outlets lead me to believe many of them are holding out until the inevitable announcement of the next Microsoft and Sony consoles. I believe a lot of that stems from the stigma that Nintendo has been battling with for years now in that they haven't grown with their core audience. In other words, folks in our generation and even younger are more inclined to play realistic and violent titles like Call of Duty as opposed to the cartoonish and kid-friendly Mario games.

Is this really what we want?
So then, what happens if the Wii U ultimately ends up failing? What could Nintendo do next? According to Michael Pachter from GameTrailers.com, going down the same path Sega went simply isn't an option.
It's widely known within industry circles that Iwata is indeed a stubborn and highly competitive person. That goes without saying being a businessman in his position. However, one has to be prepared for all possibilities. I'm under the belief that Nintendo could certainly bolster up sales through their software and the way they distribute it.

Satoru Iwata holding up a Wii U
We are in an age where digital sales have only grown stronger each passing year. Whether it's on your smartphone, home computer, or console, there is a platform available that makes it so a large list of games are available without having to get off of your couch.
Nintendo has been notorious for falling behind in terms of online features and yet their eShop on the Wii U has been met with a lot of positive feedback. They seemingly took some cues from Valve's Steam platform by making the eShop more "developer friendly" which hooks in more support. That ease of use has also been transitioned over to the consumer's end making it considerably easier to find what you're looking for, download it, and play.

Nintendo eShop
Knowing the culture of a company like Nintendo, failure simply isn't an option for them. There would have to be a situation presented to them where there was no other alternative but go down the third party developer route. I believe that even if the Wii U were to not meet expectations, Nintendo would still bounce back with at least one more effort in the home console market. Sales for the 3DS have steadily improved since its so-so launch and I can see the same happening for the Wii U.
It's hard for me to tell whether I'm a little jaded by the Nintendo mystique or actually being realistic in terms of the business world. One side of me says that they're a company that focuses entirely on video games unlike mega corporations like Sony and Microsoft. The other side is throwing up his arms in a shrug-like motion spouting "C'mon, it's Nintendo!"
For now, I'm just going to hold onto the notion that it would take something bigger than the Wii U failing for "The Big N" to fall. I mean, c'mon! Right?
More wicked cool stories and video from around the web. Got tips for us? Tips@ScrewAttack.com














g1 DISCUSSIONS
hama
I do love the more realistic games on the Xbox and Playstation platformsrisks
docxraytech
Considering the demand, at least in my area, for the original Wii, I don't see anything wrong with the way Nintendo handles their business. I've had every generation of Nintendo game system. And while I do love the more realistic games on the Xbox and Playstation platforms, I find the Nintendo games a very relaxing and fun way to play. X ray tech salary is the name of the game.
docxraytech
Considering the demand, at least in my area, for the original Wii, I don't see anything wrong with the way Nintendo handles their business. I've had every generation of Nintendo game system. And while I do love the more realistic games on the Xbox and Playstation platforms, I find the Nintendo games a very relaxing and fun way to play. X ray tech salary is the name of the game.
docxraytech
Considering the demand, at least in my area, for the original Wii, I don't see anything wrong with the way Nintendo handles their business. I've had every generation of Nintendo game system. And while I do love the more realistic games on the Xbox and Playstation platforms, I find the Nintendo games a very relaxing and fun way to play. X ray tech salary is the name of the game.
fotgs
I wonder what an average salary gets to for a game developer. i'm pretty sure it's over $50k per year
darkhyrulelord
I'm hopeful that Nintendo can become successful with their new console. You have to remember that consoles like these take time to get the praise they need. However, I could possibly see Nintendo focusing more on the handheld market and become a 3rd party developer down the road or something. If I had to guess, they probably would be more willing to with Sony but who knows. Perhaps Valve and Nintendo would team up.
CrazyDuck
Playstation 2 & 3 had horrible support their first 2 years. Very few games few decent games every now & then. The only reason Sony did not crash & burn with both of them is massive advertisement and being the cheapest dvd/blu ray player when they came out.
I remember for both the PS2 & PS3 that they were being bought in our store for the only reason that they were as expensive as the new format players. So why would you not get the device that can do more. To this day i still view the Dreamcast as the better gaming console as the PS2.
But back on topic :) I don't see Nintendo having the same problems as Sega. Sega sadly did poorly with the Saturn. Al tough I love the Saturn and it has some great games it could never compete against the big N names and the lower priced PS1. While Nintendo was getting their sequels for their big names, Saturn had none of that. No Sonic, no streets of rage, no phantasy star, etc. So I think a lot of people just lost interest in Sega there. What Sega should have done then is promote the DC to the high heavens. But they didn't ... Almost the full marketing budget for the DC in Europe was blown on having Manchester City (if i'm not mistaken it was a big soccer team anyway) play with jerseys with the DC logo on it for a few weeks. *insert jackie chan wtf meme picture here*
Nintendo has a big enough fanbase to get them to buy the hardware just purely for the next big franchise title. They are not going anywhere soon I think
Demonio Penguino
Oh, WOW. Really. You're actually suggesting this. Whoever made this is an idiot.
Magnius
Nintendo made some stumbles! THE END IS NIGH!!!!!
Metroidvania98
The market cap for core consoles (steam box is possible an outlier) is three. We have seen that pushed before but it results in someone being forced out of the market for not being profitable. As a result MS, Sony and Nintendo can all make money just like was the case this generation. There is a third place and that, as of this writing, is MS (Sony beat them in hardware sales by a tad but that might change) but they have been at least as profitable as Sonys playstation brand in recent years so they are doing fine. So no matter who is third this upcoming generation they will all make money. And I think Nintendo is clearly the safest of the bunch as if they only sell slightly less than the competition they will still make more money as making games on weaker hardware is quicker, simpler and cheaper. That said, if the Steambox is going to force someone out of the market its going to be Sony. MS is doing amazing and making tons of money and are really profitable but Sony has been struggling with all their other branches and as of recent haven't been doing that well with their gaming side either (the Vita flop, the PS3 games not selling as much as xbox ones, etc) so the only one really on thin ice is sony.
So, Nintendo will do fine. They might "lose" the upcoming console war (no way to know until its over) but they will still turn out a profit and will probably make another console afterwards (unless, in the next 5 to 10 years, digital distribution kicks off as much as it seems it will and internet speeds increase several times over causing hardware cycles to phase out, etc)