Nintendo sued by former Sony employee over 3DS display patent
So it appears Nintendo is being sued by a former Sony employee for a patent filed in 2003. What's his story? Read on to find out!
Editor's Note: I believe this is what is referred to as "patent trolling". PS: Nintendo has a faced similar threats before and won, so I don't think Mr. Tomita is getting a single penny from The "Big N".
Seijiro Tomita, a former employee of Sony, is suing Nintendo over the technology implemented in the 3DS. Mr. Tomita had filed a patent for providing 3D images without the use of 3D glasses way back in 2003. He also met up with Nintendo that same year and showed several representatives a prototype during the time period when his patent was pending, and now, says his attorney:
"He actually felt betrayed and hurt that they were using his technology."
- Joe Diamante
He's currently suing for damages, which amounts to $9.80 for every 3DS sold (As of now, the 3DS has sold a little less than 30 million units). Scott Lindvall, Nintendo's representative, countered his claim by saying the Nintendo 3DS does not use certain aspects of Mr. Tomita's patent. In addition to that, prior to his meeting, Nintendo had met up with several vendors who were trying to profit from their own 3D display tech patents. One of which was a meeting with Sharp, the current supplier for the 3DS' stereoscopic screen, which transpired back in 2002.
If you're curious, here's a list of patents for a 3D-glasses-less stereoscopic display.
The funny (well, not really) thing is isn't the first time Nintendo has been in legal troubles: In 1984, Nintendo went to court because Universal Studios claimed to have the rights to King Kong and that Donkey Kong was infringing upon the trademark. Guess what? They lost to Nintendo because they didn't have the rights and the lawyer who defended Nintendo, John Kirby, got a boat with the name Donkey Kong on it. Some people also believe this little psychopath is named after him:

Aww, he kills you by eating you... Seriously, Nintendo made this monster? As for how this will play out, my guess is that Mr. Tomita will get an undisclosed settlement and everyone will forget this whole thing happening in a week, twelve days top.
Anyway, do you think Seijiro Tomita has a case?
More wicked cool stories and video from around the web. Got tips for us? Tips@ScrewAttack.com











g1 DISCUSSIONS
Cup_of_Grapes
Sorry Sony I love your work as well as nintendo, I have both nintendo and sony and I dont think they copy
m3Atl0afman
NOOOO. Nintendo doesn't copy Sony. SONY copies Nintendo.
DougU
Nintendo's had complaints filed for "copying" technology before, like the Wii motion controls, they'll probably win this one again.
Zeroandx
You know, a year after its release. Its not like the 3DS was a notable console and sold millions worldwide or anything.
gamereviewerbr
Tomita will be the villain in the next Kirby game
Sergeant Smithy
There must be something I don't understand about the lawsuit process here in the States. Why does it always take so long after these systems come out for the patent suit to be filed? The 3DS didn't exactly fly under the radar.
Sergeant Smithy
Maxim Tomita?
McKnackus I
I don't think the claim is totally unfounded, but I don't think there's enough going for him to win against Nintendo. They clearly went for Sharp's design. Whatever the case, hopefully it will result in a new Nintendo IP named after a lawyer.
HeatBombastic
I think Tomita's being honest, but if the Big N has a pretty sound argument. Nintendo's probably gonna win this one.
AndrewKV
Well, I remember reading about an Alpex vs. Nintendo lawsuit on patent infringement by the SNES technology, and Alpex actually won because of a very cunning attorney. The decision was later overturned.