SideScrollers - "When Angels Appear"
Get the Audio version here - http://bit.ly/VKzXw0
SideScrollers Extended can be watched here - http://bit.ly/WMGunY
Check out our Tokyo Game Show Coverage - http://bit.ly/NOSAvC
Sam goes one-on-one with Playboy's Miss October 2012 - http://bit.ly/PlzJKb
Review - PETA's Pokemon: Black and Blue - http://bit.ly/T09FQA
5 Reasons We Kinda Dislike the New TMNT Cartoon - http://bit.ly/Q98xKT
28 Reasons We LOVE the new TMNT Cartoon - http://bit.ly/R8dMud
VGV - Wrestlemania The Arcade Game (SNES) - http://bit.ly/SDpQbO
The Clip - Re-Debuting Soon! - http://bit.ly/R1l8m8
In Regards to Jared's Departure - http://bit.ly/SAyV5o
VGV - Twisted Metal - http://bit.ly/SzJndm
The Worst EVER: Mascot - http://bit.ly/SPGlvX
Have a question for the Middle Segment? Post it on our wall - http://bit.ly/ODx8e3
Want to submit a birthday picture? Send an email to Chad@ScrewAttack.com
Follow us on Twitter!
Craig - https://twitter.com/StutteringCraig
Chad - https://twitter.com/ScrewAttackChad
The most I lost was onetime I was playing a ps3 it was a old one, one of the backwards compatible ones. I had TONS of ps2 data even like the entire .hack series on all games, etc. In a power outtage my PS2 did the yellow light of death and no ps3 were backwards since...plus a new game got stuck in it and I live in the middle of no where so I don't have a repair shop really close. So I had to cut it open to get it back I pretty much cried over losing it all. You can see the results here : http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150754046510158.714918.629435...
Wow only read some lines, after the first few sentences. It seems that you are just saying things now that I clearly did not say and saying I am implying certain things when it certainly isn't there. You seem to be just a stereotypical english teacher, always reading between the lines and pulling some bullshit meaning out of what you read to fit want you would like it to mean.
"You also seem to have used the "can you not read line" the same way you accused me of."
I feel like you need a slow clap for actually getting to the end. I was repeating your insult as a form of irony. I'm sad to see if went over your head.
"Second, the words which I say you put in my mouth or which you think I said, are that screwattack is still making less content. "
Anyone with half a brain cell merely needs to scroll up to see what you originally said. Please stop insulting my intelligence, and that of anyone who reads this, by pretending you didn't say what you said. Thanks.
"You said I tried to defend my careless claim by saying afterwards that I only meant one week."
It's very easy for one to claim they "meant" to say something other then what they said later on when they realize they're wrong. Sorry, not convincing me. "Now" by the way, implied many things other then "this week", so please spare me the babble.
"I never said that now that Jared's gone that there will never be as much content on screwattack or that there is always going to be less content or some outrageous claim."
It was in response to someone talking about Jared being gone, therefore in proper context, you did say just that. Therefore this quoted statement is not just bullshit, it's an outright lie.
"As far as I know Jared shows or content includes Hard News, Sidescroller's, Newsroom and Reviews."
Newsroom's final episode had already come out for that week's content. This site has always operated with Sidescrollers being the beginning and ending of a week. The other three were covered.
I feel like I should also comment on the fact that calling them Jared's shows is a little bit of a swing. The site has been doing reviews, Hard News and Sidescrollers long before Jared was around, it's going to keep doing them, they're not actually synonymous with Jared. As for Newsroom, it's really nothing more then an extended piece of "Clip of the Week", which hasn't stopped either, and the few entries into "Random Awesome" sort of make up for it's lack.
Part of the problem is your statement implies that Jared was a sole source of content on this site, it sort of neglects to consider the rest of the site staff or the multitudes of g1's who provide site content. You want a root to why I was annoyed even seeing the comment? That's it. Any decent g1 wouldn't root a single person's contribution as the whole of everything the site has to offer. That goes against the very point of what this site is and does, and what the community means to it.
"Now for his shows, you said that they were churned out and that his shows were covered for, which is false."
Here's why you should stop asking people whether or not they can read. I stated there was just as much content, if not more, I did not however, state that Jared's shows in particular were a part of that number. That's an unknown qualifier you are now using in an attempt to be right.
"PETA Pokemon Black & Blue review."
I certainly cover every bit of content. I don't leave shit out so it can work for my convenience like you do.
"For you saying that I was trolling was your own assumption, and that you also said I was enraged that you called me out for trolling was another. I usually never get angry when people call me things I am not because what they're saying is false so I have nothing to get angry about. The only times I would get angry is from a sheer amount of ignorance from the person making the claim, but that rarely happens. I can see where you think I am a troll though from you not fully understanding what I had said in my comment, and also from me asking if you could even read(which I touched upon earlier in this comment why I said it)."
And even then you very poorly attempted to use it to claim your words carry only specific meanings that work for you. When asking someone if they can read you should PROBABLY first learn the definition for every word you're using.
"For some of your points you say that you countered by saying the opposite of what I said. In the future try and prove why statement are true, rather just stating it is true just because you said it was, since that is the same thing that you accused me off."
No, I never had to because what I said was actually verifiable simply by checking the feed. (I'm now going to have to actually put out an outline to show that your claim that you meant "for that week" and more specifically "the week that you posted that first comment" on is nothing more the blowing smoke), but we both know it is. As I pointed out, you stating something that isn't true doesn't make it true. You're kinda the one who first needs to prove your statements to have actually been true.
Seeing as you have now responded by claiming I need to prove you wrong with data while you've done nothing more then add to your own words without proof... why should I be arsed?
"I hope you understand where I am coming from now and understand what I have said and I hope that there won't be anymore animosity between us. I'll understand though if you would like to counter any of my points that you think are false as that is exactly as I did. Hope you read this message."
Actually, I'm pretty angry over the "can you read remark", especially since you in summary "explained yourself" by making up a whole new "strategy" to what your initial comment meant, not an inch of which is actually explained to not be understood with a lack of reading skills.
Can you just simply admit you made a very broad and encompassing statement that wasn't true? Or do we need to debate the exact uses of the word "now" when used in a reply to someone talking about hanging around the site on a much more permanent basis due to a change that would affect more then just a single week of time?
And for the love of Pete, employ line breaks in your replies, that block of text is my excuse for any inconsistencies in my reply.
Alright let's have some fun. First off you said I would respond to you with a comment saying "NO U" or something along those lines which was an assumption you made, just like how I said that you couldn't read, which I only said because it seemed like you were putting words in my mouth which I did not say. You also seem to have used the "can you not read line" the same way you accused me of. Second, the words which I say you put in my mouth or which you think I said, are that screwattack is still making less content. Obviously they are making more now, with the fact they they re-implemented Out of the Box and have been making more reviews as of late. You said I tried to defend my careless claim by saying afterwards that I only meant one week. My original reply to the comment was "That's silly that you'd visit more often now that there is less content". Keyword there is now. I never said that now that Jared's gone that there will never be as much content on screwattack or that there is always going to be less content or some outrageous claim. I simply said that now there is less content and now being when I posted that comment. Which was the week after Jared left. Now for his shows, you said that they were churned out and that his shows were covered for, which is false. As far as I know Jared shows or content includes Hard News, Sidescroller's, Newsroom and Reviews. Hard News and Sidescroller's were covered but there were not any Newsroom or Reviews since he left, unless you count the PETA Pokemon Black & Blue review. So even as low as the number may be there was still less content. I agree with you that now(as I am writing this comment) there is more content then when Jared was here, I never said otherwise. The other content which came out that week that you were taking about I am assuming(you can correct me if I'm wrong) is Out of the Box which did start that week but after the original post was written. For you saying that I was trolling was your own assumption, and that you also said I was enraged that you called me out for trolling was another. I usually never get angry when people call me things I am not because what they're saying is false so I have nothing to get angry about. The only times I would get angry is from a sheer amount of ignorance from the person making the claim, but that rarely happens. I can see where you think I am a troll though from you not fully understanding what I had said in my comment, and also from me asking if you could even read(which I touched upon earlier in this comment why I said it). Not sure why you would associate what I said though with some "cool kid" tactic. Even though you probably aren't convinced, I am a completely reasonable person and my opinion can sway to either side of an argument based on the proof I am given. So even though I felt it was silly that someone would visit screwattack less now that Jared is gone, because I said there was less content, I agreed with them afterwards because they said their reasoning was that they didn't like Jared, which is a valid point. Also one last thing. For some of your points you say that you countered by saying the opposite of what I said. In the future try and prove why statement are true, rather just stating it is true just because you said it was, since that is the same thing that you accused me off. I hope you understand where I am coming from now and understand what I have said and I hope that there won't be anymore animosity between us. I'll understand though if you would like to counter any of my points that you think are false as that is exactly as I did. Hope you read this message.
What part of what I said was hard for you to read. I contradicted your BS statement and then stated that even the week after, content continued to increase. In short, you made a false claim. Asking whether or not I can read is a very poor comeback when you clearly can't do so yourself.
1. Your first comment in this chain was to say that there's "now less content", I countered by stating that wasn't the case at all.
2. You decided to try and defend your already careless claim by then stipulating you meant for that one week only.
3. Considering Jared's shows still churned out for that week and the programs he wasn't present for were covered, and another feature was launched that week, your statement was false, I pointed this out, and as a clincher added that even more content came out after that.
I'm not going to even question your apparently lack of g1 attitude, since suggesting that the site is ever short of content when the community itself posts the vast majority of it just shows your lack of interest or actual care about the site you're posting on.
4. Enraged at someone daring to call you on your trolling, you then questioned them as to whether or not they could read. I, the person in question, happen to be a professor of English Literature, sure as hell that I can read, I've decided to also add a lecture for you.
5. You are now likely going to try some comment where you, in short, go "NO U", or attempt to throw things back in my face by simply stating I'm wrong and continuing your claim because you can't let go of a childish internet debate and see fit to insult someone rather then fess up to the fact that you were trying to sound cool and in your haste, in fact only succeeded in making a monkey out of yourself.
6. I stop looking at this thread, ignore your comments henceforth, because your complete disrespect in assuming that I'd be dumb enough to fall for one of the oldest troll / "cool kid" tactics in the book employed by prepubescents in terrible need to prove they're right about everything tend to employ.
Does this satisfy your query to the fullest potential possible, or can you not read?
Apparently you can't read. I said in the week between Jared left and I posted the original comment.
Not really, no. And there's even more shows going now, so how's your math doing?
In the week that the original comment was posted and jared left there were less shows. Pretty simple math right there
In rugby, getting hit in the nuts is the least of your worries. I played a whole half once with busted ribs. The adrenaline and the fact that you're in constant pain anyway from the impact nature of the sport just pretty much dulls everything you feel till much later. Rugby is serious business here in South Africa ;)
My first time through Tales of the Abyss, I lost about 10 hours of progress because I tried to throw away a canister of Mini M&M's from my chair into a trash can that was about 10 feet away. I missed the toss, and somehow the canister bounced off 3 or 4 different objects and into the "off" button of the power strip I was using. Never raged so hard in my life.
Arrgh curse you Angel for bringing up my repressed memories of me losing all of my sonic adventure 2 chao data, I had like 7 super strong chaos then bam gamecube turned of whilst saving, i remember that i got so mad that i tried to kill all of the starting chaos when i restarted
No it makes sense cause I never liked Jared so Im here more because hes not...
i would have died lol
Ball busting episode.
It would have been funny if they added Jared as a topic on the wheel
IMO I figured this site to be more of a moderate type gamer site not one that went into the more nerdy aspects of Gaming. I think each site has their own "flavor" and which niche of the gaming community they cater too.
Forgot Jared was one of the editors.
D: now im scared for my balls
Craig, the main reason why they don't wear cups is because there is a high chance from a hard tackle that the cup can shatter causing it to puncture their junk.
I remember playing Fable 2 and I was so close to buying the castle, After not playing the game for few weeks, I tried to load up the save, The save file was corrupted and I lost all of my progress I had everything, All i need was the mansion. I snapped the game in half.