Bortch: I am nervous with their choice to exclude multiplayer. Granted, I did not play the newest Wolfenstein on PS3 or 360, but I did play the older ones on PC. The reason they last so longer was because of multiplayer. The multiplayer had different classes, each with a non-customizable loadout but a special ability that made them unique.

Medics could revive dead partners (even though you can still respawn the maps were so big that getting back to the action could take a while), the gunners gave out ammo, scouts could mark characters. If you've ever played Call of Duty 3's multiplayer (I'm taking the WWII one made by Treyarch back in the day) then you know what their influence is now.

What made multiplayer so great was that you never really revolved around eliminating the enemy team, it was best when you played objectives like protecting a tank through a broken down castle to reach the other end. One team always spawned in the floor level with the tank and walked with it to make sure it was protected while the other team spawned on felt lot like a single player campaign and having 30+ people at a Lan party to play it with always made it intense and fun. sometimes a game could take 2-3 hours to complete. That's insane even by PC gaming standards today.

However, I am aware that this is probably not the same team that worked on the old game so I guess I should start getting surprised when these companies head off in a different direction. We'll see how it turns out, but I really wish they would consider something in terms of grand scale multiplayer in the future, especially with the PS4 and "INFINITE" coming out.

tricobalt: Something tells me there was a multiplayer but they realized that it sucked so they didn't release it. Probably though fear of more backlash over shitty games that suck ass.